As a Taoist I've often wondered how our
perception of Taoism in the West differs from the perception in the
East. I've had lengthy and heated conversations regarding this topic,
in particular whether or not Westerners can ever really understand
Taoism as it was intended to be transmitted. The terms themselves
should bring to light some of the difficulty in coming to terms with
a fair and just determination, in particular phrases such as
transmitted, or transmission, which is very much an Eastern idea, not
a Western.
Transmission is essentially the way a
path is spread, but our own understanding as American Taoists may not
hit the mark when it comes to how it was originally and traditionally
understood. This notion in itself can cause problems, especially if
one is devoted to such terms as authentic, correct, and real. In fact
in most debates regarding the capacity of a Western person's ability
to understand Taoism this is the crux of the argument, that our
inability to understand the social and cultural nuances of Eastern
(in this case Chinese) philosophy leaves us lacking in regards to
understanding Taoism. This is also one of the reasons why many
Americans who identify themselves as being authentic Taoists argue
that the only way for one to truly understand Taoism is by
understanding the nuances of the culture.
In essence the argument is that one
must be taught to think in the Eastern cultural context, to be able
to see one's self identity in a way that allows them to understand
their relationship to their community and the tradition in an Eastern
sense. In reality much of this is impossible, simply because there is
a cultural divide that can never be navigated, so with this argument
one could assume that a Western individual could never really attain
an understanding of Taoism as it is taught (or transmitted) in
Eastern philosophy. Perhaps the traditionalists are right in assuming
this, but at the same time one might ask the question, is it
necessary to change one's perception of self in order to gain the
benefits of practice from Taoism? Can one actually achieve the same
fundamentals of Taoism without changing the fundamental sense of self
that is indicative in the Western mindset?
I wont mislead you, I believe it is,
and in believing this I guess I am not a traditionalist. But in
believing this, I also believe that the greatest fundamental present
in Taoism is freedom of self, which is why many American's seem to be
drawn to Taoism in the first place. After all, we are taught as
Americans that freedom is not only a right, but what each of us
should endeavor to protect. Of course our definitions of freedom may
differ from the Chinese, especially in the context of politics,
family, and society, but at its core the essential is the same, that
freedom is something that strengthens the community, rather than
hinders it.
This essential belief arises over and
over throughout the Tao Te Ching, but is most eloquently posed within
the question, “How great is the difference between 'eh' and 'oh',
must I believe what others believe? What abysmal nonsense is this!”
You see Taoism, especially as it was taught by Lao Tzu, was not just a
philosophy of personal freedom, but also one of personal inquiry. We are
taught as Taoists to question what we are taught, but not so that we
can rebel against the society in which we live, but rather to
understand more closely how that society works, it's virtues and
flaws, and in so understanding this, come to a greater understanding
of how we can become a benefit to that society, and I believe,
ultimately the world at large.
With that said I should return to the
original question, can we as Westerners ever really understand Taoism
as it was transmitted to the East? Perhaps not, but in our exposure
to the philosophy we certainly can adapt it so that we can use its
most basic lessons to strengthen our own sense of self and society.
We can take what we get from it and use it in a way to become
American Taoists and in so doing, use it as a means to better our own
community.
I think the first step to understanding
our own place in society is ultimately personal inquiry. It requires
contemplation, meditation, and self-discipline and at its most basic
essence it is a process of examination in which we honestly look at
who we are, how we became who we are, and ultimately the reality of
what that is. Of course that in itself is a topic for another
discussion, but for right now it leaves us at a wonderful place to
stop, if for no other reason than to contemplate these questions on
our own.
Thanks for reading.